TODAY’S STUDENTS ARE TOMORROW’S COLLEAGUES: EXPLORING THE NURSE EDUCATOR-STUDENT RELATIONSHIP IN AN EMERGING DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA

Authors

  • Sheila Mokoboto-Zwane University of South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/148

Abstract

Following the introduction of the new democratic dispensation in South Africa, anxiety and fear were observed to permeate society, including the nursing profession. Nursing colleges have been constantly characterised by strife and conflict between nurse educators and nursing students. A qualitative study utilising in-depth phenomenological interviews was conducted to explore the nurse educator-student relationship at a Nursing College in Gauteng. The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the nurse educator-student relationship following the democratic dispensation in the country. During March 2013, 19 participants consisting of 10 nurse educators and 9 nursing students were sampled and interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using Tesch’s method. The findings reflected experiencing enhancers among few within the two groups of participants. These were characterised by positive attitudes, interaction and feelings. The majority experienced obstacles, characterised by negative attitudes, interaction and feelings towards one another, impacting negatively on the learning-teaching environment. A third group was non-committal about how they experienced relationship with one another. A unique contribution of these findings is that students viewed nurse educators as lacking political astuteness. Students became increasingly frustrated by what they regarded as political naivety among nurse educators. The study concluded that the interplay between politics, democracy and transparency on the one hand, and nursing education, human rights and support on the other, is critically important. Recommendations of the study were that while there was a need for nurse educators to be provided with emotional and professional support so they can, in turn, support students adequately, they too need to familiarise themselves with political changes taking place in the country, especially in as far as these changes affect health reform. In addition, further research should be conducted to explore the value of political education in the curriculum of nurse education.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Adrian-Taylor, S., Noels, K. & Tischler, K., 2007. Conflict between international graduate students and faculty supervisors: toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies. Journal of Studies in International Education 11(1):90–117.

Arbaugh, J.B. & Benbunan-Fich R., 2009. Learning in communities of inquiry: a review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education 23(1):19–48.

Billings, D.M. & Halstead, J.A. 2012. Teaching in nursing: a guide for faculty. 4th Edition. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders.

Brockman, J.L., Nunez, A.A. & Basu, A. 2010. Effectiveness of a conflict resolution training program in changing graduate students’ style of managing conflict with their faculty advisors. Innovation in Higher Education 35:277–293.

Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. 2009. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique and utilization. 6thedition. St Louis: Elsevier/Saunders.

Clark, C. & Springer, P. 2007 Incivility in nursing education: a descriptive study of definitions and prevalence. Journal of Nursing Education 46(1):7–14.

Clark, C.M. 2008a. The dance of incivility in nursing education as described by nursing faculty and students. Advances in Nursing Science 31(4):E37–E54.

Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research design – qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J.W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ehlers, V.J. 2000. Nursing and politics: a South African perspective. International Nursing Review (47)2:74–82.

Harrison, T.R. 2007. My professor is so unfair: student attitudes and experiences of conflict with faculty. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24(3):349–367.

Holloway, I. & Wheeler, S. 2010. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. 3rd edition. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Huber, D.L. 2006. Leadership and nursing care management. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier.

Killen, R. 2010. Teaching strategies for quality teaching and learning. 2nd edition. Claremont: Juta & Company Ltd.

Kotze, W. (ed.). 2008. Nurse educators’ guide to management. Pretoria:Van Schaik.

Musano, S.D. 2004. Peace and conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology 10(1):85–86.

Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. 2012. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9thedition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.

Rahim, M.A. 2010. Managing conflict in organizations. 4thedition. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

SAPA. 2013. Bara Nursing College closed indefinitely. Mail & Guardian, 16 January 2013:4.

South African Nursing Council. 2008. R.425 Students. Pretoria: SANC.

South African Nursing Council. 2014. http://www.sanc.co.za/pdf/Competencies/SANC%20Competencies-Nurse%20Educator%202014-07.pdf (Accessed 28/10/2014).

Streubert, H.J. & Carpenter, D.R. 2011. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 5th edition. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Tantleff-Dunn, S., Dunn M.E. & Gokee, J.L. 2002. Understanding faculty-student conflict: student perceptions of precipitating events and faculty responses. Teaching of Psychology 29(3):197–202.

Wong, M. 2012. Faculty matters. Nursing Education Perspectives 44(1):8–10.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-27

How to Cite

Mokoboto-Zwane, Sheila. 2015. “TODAY’S STUDENTS ARE TOMORROW’S COLLEAGUES: EXPLORING THE NURSE EDUCATOR-STUDENT RELATIONSHIP IN AN EMERGING DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA”. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 17 (1):118-32. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/148.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-04-16
Accepted 2015-05-07
Published 2015-07-27