STUDENT NURSES’ EXPECTATIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY VERSUS ACTUAL EXPERIENCES OF A SIMULATION AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Authors

  • Annemarie Joubert School of Nursing University of the Free State
  • Magda Mulder School of Nursing University of the Free State
  • Petrus Nel Department of Industrial Psychology University of the Free State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/182

Keywords:

empathy, reliability, responsiveness, service quality, simulation, tangibles

Abstract

Simulations may assist students to deal with differences in focus between what they learn in the classroom with what is expected in the clinical practice situation – more specifically the needs of the patient. In addition, simulations assist students to become active participants in their own learning and use their knowledge when thinking and applying what they have learned in a healthcare setting. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between nursing students’ expectations regarding the quality of simulated training and their actual evaluation of the experience of such simulations. Using convenience sampling, a total of 30 student nurses completed two questionnaires that measured their expectations regarding service quality (SERVQUAL) and their actual satisfaction with the simulation. Both questionnaires had acceptable levels of reliability,  except for the responsiveness and assurance dimensions of the SERVQUAL instrument. Student nurses reported high expectations related to the following aspects of service: assurance, reliability and tangibles. In addition, the majority of these expectations, except for assurance, had substantial correlations (r>0.4) with numerous dimensions associated with the actual experience of simulated training. In essence, 27 (90%) student nurses reported that they were very satisfied that the simulated training had met their expectations, and that the School of Nursing had the necessary capacity to host such simulations. Moreover, 27 (90%) students also viewed the simulations as being helpful to stimulate critical thinking. Finally, 24 students (79%) were of the opinion that simulations helped them to effectively communicate as a team.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alinier, G. (2007). A typology of educationally focused medical simulation tools. Medical Teacher, 29(8), e243-e250.

Alinier, G., Hunt, W., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), 359-369.

Astin, A. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York, American Council on Education.

Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K.J., & Swan, J.E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: A critical review of service quality. The Journal of Services Marketing, 10(6), 62-81.

Bailey, J.E., & Pearson, S.W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analysing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.

Berragan, L. (2013). Conceptualising learning through simulation: An expansive approach for professional and personal learning. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 250-255.

Bradley, J., & Bleakley, A. (2006). Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? Medical Teacher, 28 (7), 606-613.

Cant, R.P., & Cooper, S.J. (2009). Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 3-15.

Haluck, R.S., Satava, R.M., Fried, G., Lake, C., Sachdeva, A.K., Scymour, N.E., Terry, M.L., & Wilks, D. (2007). Establishing a simulation center for surgical skills: What to do and how to do it. Surgical Endoscopy, 21, 1223-1232.

Hovancsek, M. T. (2007). Using simulations in nursing education. In P. R. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (pp. 1-10). New York: National League for Nursing.

Issenberg, S.B., Ringsted, C., Østergaard, D., & Dieckmnn, P. (2011). Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare: A synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting. Sim Healthcare, 6, 155-167.

Jeffries, P.R. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspective, 26(2), 96-103.

Jeffries, P.R., & Rizzolo, M.A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. National League for Nursing, New York.

Kirkpatrick, D.J. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 32(9), 78-92.

Morgan, R. (2006). Using clinical skills laboratories to promote theory-practice integration during first practice placement: An Irish perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(2), 155-161.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

Prion, S. (2008). A practical framework for evaluating the impact of clinical simulation experiences in prelicensure nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 4, e69-e78.

Tredoux, C., & Durrheim, K. (2002). Numbers, hypotheses, and conclusions: A course in statistics for the social sciences. Lansdowne, Cape Town: UCT Press.

Weis, P., & Guyton-Simmons, J. (1998). A computer simulation for teaching critical thinking skills. Nurse Educator, 23(2), 30-33.

Zeith, K., & McCutcheon, H. (2005). Tradition, rituals and standards, in a realm of evidenced based nursing care. Contemporary Nurse, 18, 300-308.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-05

How to Cite

Joubert, Annemarie, Magda Mulder, and Petrus Nel. 2015. “STUDENT NURSES’ EXPECTATIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY VERSUS ACTUAL EXPERIENCES OF A SIMULATION AT A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION”. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 17 (2):75-88. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/182.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-05-11
Accepted 2015-08-12
Published 2016-01-05