IDEOLOGIES AND THEORIES FOR YOUTH PRACTICE WORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1727-7140/1608Keywords:
ideologies, theories, youth work, youth workers, youth, youth developmentAbstract
There are many youth workers who continue to design their interventions without any theoretical basis, despite a long history of youth work as a field of practice. The aim of this article is to present selected ideologies and theoretical frameworks underpinning youth work practice. These ideologies and theories, although predominantly borrowed from other disciplines, provide insight on how youth work should be practised.
Based on a thorough literature review, the authors have selected different theories and ideologies that youth workers, like other professionals, are expected to know, understand and to adapt to youth work practice. These theories are important and would serve as theoretical frameworks on which youth work interventions will be based and, thereby, provide youth workers with the means to predict and analyse the situations of young people from different viewpoints to enable the development of different strategies to address relevant problems.
The article concludes that theories and ideologies should be used as reference points, and youth workers mix and match different theories and ideologies depending on the nature of problem they are addressing at that particular time.
References
Anfara, V. A. and N. T. Mertz. 2006. Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. United States of America: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986335
Arnette, J. J. 2001. Emerging adulthood: what is it, what is it good for. Child Development Perspectives. 1 (2), 68--73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x
Benson, P. L. 2002. Adolescent development in Social and Community context: a program of research. In R. M. Lerner, C. S. Taylor and A. von Eye, ed. Pathways to positive development among diverse youth: new directions for youth development, 123--148. USA, California: Wiley Periodicals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.19
Benson, P. L. and J. K. Pittman. 2001. Trends in youth development: visions, realities and challenges. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1459-6
USA, Boston: Academic Publishers.
Borden, L. M., D. L. Craig and F. A. Villaruel. 2004. Professionalising youth development: the role of higher education. New directions for youth development 104: 75--85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.100
Broadbent, R. 2006. Establishing good practice in planning and youth work practice. Commonwealth Youth and Development 4 (1), 49--62.
Brown, N. A. 2004. Promoting adolescent livelihoods. Commonwealth and Youth development 2
(2), 5--23.
Burger, J. M. 2009. Biological approach. In Department of Psychology, University of Johannesburg. Introduction to field in psychology. Johannesburg: McGraw-Hill Education.
Chess, W. A. and J. M. Norlin. 1991. Human behavior and the social environment (2nd ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Commonwealth Secretariat. 2001a. Diploma -- Youth in Development Work module. Working with young people in their communities. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Commonwealth Secretariat. 2001b. Diploma -- Youth in Development Work modules. Principles of young people and health. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Coulshed, V. and J. Orme. 2006. Social work practice (4th ed.). China: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-19255-4
Damon, W. 2004. What is positive youth development - The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 59, 13--24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260092
Davies, M. 2004. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Social work. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.
Delport, C. S. L., C. B. Fouché and W. Schurink, W. 2011. Theory and literature in qualitative research.
In A. S. de Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché and C. S. L. Delport, ed. Research at the grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions, 297--306 (4thed.). Pretoria: JL Van Schaik.
De Vos, A. S., H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché and C. S. L. Delport. 2011. Building a scientific base for the helping professions. In A. S. de Vos, H. Strydom, C. B. Fouché and C. S. L. Delport, eds. Research at the grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions, 507--513 (4th ed.).
Pretoria: JL Van Schaik.
Garfat, T. 2003. A child and youth care approach to working with families. Child and Youth Care Services, 25 (1/2), 7--37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J024v25n01_02
Gilbert, N. and H. Specht. 1981. The emergence of social welfare and social work. (2nd ed.) Illinois:
F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
Hahn, A. B. and G. A. Raley. 1998. Youth development on the path towards professionalisation. Non-profit management and leadership 8 (4), 387--401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.8406
Hamacheck, D. E. 1988. Evaluating self-concept and ego development within Erikson’s psychosocial framework: a formulation. Journal of Counselling and Development 66 (8), 354- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1988.tb00886.x
-360.
Krauss, E. S. and T. Suandi. 2008. The potential of youth workers as facilitators of values formation and development. Commonwealth Youth and Development 6 (1), 2--14.
Lerner, R. M., C. Bretano, E. M. Dowling and P. M. Anderson. 2002. Positive youth development: thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. In R.M. Lerner, C.S. Taylor and A. Von Eye, ed. Pathways to positive development among diverse youth: new directions for youth development, 11--34. USA, CA: Wiley Periodicals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.14
May, T. and J. L. Powell. 2008. Situating social theory (2nd ed.). England: Open University Press.
Merton, B. and M. Payne. 2000. Louder than words: youth work and learning for sustainable development. UK: Youth Work Press.
Meyer, W. F., C. Moore and H. G. Viljoen. 1997. Personology: from individual to ecosystem.
Johannesburg, South Africa: Heinemann Higher and Further Education.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine Report. 2002. Community programs to promote youth development. USA.
National Youth Commission. 1997. National Youth Policy. South Africa, Pretoria.
Osei-Hwedi, K., L. Mwanza and P. Mufune. 1990. Youth and community work practice. Lusaka,
Zambia: Multimedia Publications.
Peterson, C. 2004. Positive development: realising the potential of youth. USA, Washington, D.C.: National Press Club.
Peteru, P. S. 2008. Youth development: a Pacifi c context. Commonwealth Youth and Development 6 (1), 23--35.
Pittman, K. 1993. Stronger staff stronger youth conference. Washington, D.C: Center for Youth Development and Policy Research.
Shaffer, D. R. and K. Kipp. 2009. The context of development. In Department of Psychology, University of Johannesburg. Introduction to fi elds in psychology. Johannesburg: McGraw-Hill Education.
South African Youth Workers Association. 2001. Youth work policy. South Africa.
Turner, F. 1986. Social work treatment - Interlocking theoretical approaches (3rd ed.). New York:
Macmillan.
Vander Zanden, J. W. 1993. Human development (5th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill.
Villaruel, F. A., D. F. Perkins, L. M. Borden and J. Keith. 2003. Community youth development: programs, policies and practices. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233635
Wheeler, W. 2000. Emerging organisational theory and the youth development organisation. Applied developmental science 1(4), 47--54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS04Suppl_6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher’s business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution’s website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to re-use all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.