PRACTICE AND MORE PRACTICE: ITS CENTRALITY TO YOUNG PEOPLE COPING WITH THE COMMUNICATION CHALLENGES OF THE WORKPLACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1727-7140/1921Keywords:
organisational communication, workplace practices, expert performance, deliberate practice, communication practices, novice employeesAbstract
Both oral and written communication is influential and prevalent in modern societies. This research study focused on interpersonal communication practices in a business context. The aim was to determine whether youths between 18 and 23 years of age undertaking their six-month period of internship as novice employees were adequately prepared to meet the demands of the workplace. Data were collected from the employers at organisations that employed novice employees. This provided critical perspectives on the competency of young people to cope with the communication demands of the workplace. Quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection were used. Sixty eight (68) employers completed the questionnaires. Interviews were also conducted with six randomly selected employers at the organisations where the young people were undertaking their respective internships. The findings show that workplace communication is complex and that many young people struggle to meet the challenges of communicating adequately in the workplace. Deliberate practice is fundamental to the development of communication skills and expert performance in the workplace. Recommendations are made to better prepare young people to face the challenges and demands of the dynamic workplace.
References
Bazerman, C. 1980. A relationship between reading and writing: The conversational model. College English 41: 656-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/375913
Bazerman, C. and J. Paradis (eds.). 1991. Textual dynamics of the professions. Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C. and D. Russell. 2003. Writing selves/writing societies: Research from an activity perspective. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317
Beaufort, A. 1999. Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press.
Castells, M. and G. Cardoso (eds.). 2005. The network society: From knowledge to policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.
Collis, J. and R. Hussey. 2009. Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and post graduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dekay, S.H. 2012. Interpersonal communication in the workplace: A largely unexplored region. Business Communication Quarterly 75(4): 449–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912458966
Drucker, P.F. 1969. The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. London: William Heinemann.
Friedrich, G.W. 1994. Lecture notes. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.
Grant, T. and R. Borcherds. 2002. Communicating @ work. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Griesel, H. and B. Parker. 2009. Graduate attributes: A baseline study on South African graduates from the perspective of employers. Pretoria: HESA, SAQA.
Hollis-Turner, S.L. 2008. Higher education business writing practices in office management curricula and in related workplaces. Unpublished MEd thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town.
Johnstone, K.M., H. Ashbaugh and T.D. Warfield. 2002. Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experiences on college students’ writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 94: 305–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.305
Kellogg, R.T. 2006. Professional writing expertise. In Ericsson, K.A., N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich and R.R. Hoffman (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and export performance, 389–402. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.022
Kellogg, R.T. 2008. Training writing skills: A cognitive development perspective. Journal of Writing Research 1(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Leedy, P. and J. Ormrod. 2010. Practical research – Planning and design. New York: Pearson.
Miller, C.R., J. Larsen and J. Gaitens. 1996. Communication in the workplace: What can NCSU young people expect? Research Report, Center for Communication in Science, Technology, and Management: Publication Series: 2, October 1996. North Carolina State University. Available at http://www.chass.ncsu.edu/ccstm/pubs/no2/index.html
Paretti, C.M. 2006. Audience awareness: Leveraging problem-based learning to teach workplace communication practices. Transactions on Professional Communication 49(2): 189–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.875083
Russell, D.R. 1997. Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4(4): 224–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0404_2
Schneider, B. and J. André. 2005. University preparation for workplace writing. Journal of Business Communication 42(2): 195–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605274749
South Africa. Council on Higher Education. 2013. A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: the case for a flexible curriculum structure. Report of the Task Team on Undergraduate Curriculum Structure Discussion Document. Pretoria: CHE.
Spitzberg, B.H. 1988. Communication competence: Measures of perceived effectiveness. In Tardy, C.H (ed.). A handbook for the study of human communication, 67–105. Norwood: Ablex.
UK Commission for Employment and Skills. 2009. The employability challenge. Employee demand for skills: a review of evidence and policy – Executive summary.
Walters, M., S. Hunter and E. Giddens. 2007. Qualitative research on what leads to success in professional writing. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1(2). Available at http://www.georgiasouthern.edu.ijsotl DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010216
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher’s business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution’s website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to re-use all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Accepted 2016-11-16
Published 2017-03-28
