AMBIGUITIES OF FORGIVENESS IN LEFT TO TELL: DISCOVERING GOD AMIDST THE RWANDAN HOLOCAUST (2006)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2078-9785/1849Keywords:
Genocide, Left to tell, Discovering God amidst the Rwandan holocaust, perpetrator, restorative justice, victimAbstract
To interrogate the ambiguities of forgiveness it is important to understand the historicity of the Rwandan genocide and the complexities of the interchanging roles of victim/perpetrator and ‘the enemy other’. Ilibagiza is credited for including the historicity of the ethnic animosity in her memoir, as she acknowledges that the 1994 genocide did not just suddenly erupt, but the work will be critiqued for its persistent portrayal of the Tutsi as victims and the Hutu as perpetrators, and for not acknowledging that the Tutsi were a ‘historically privileged’ (Mamdani 2001) group before the 1959 revolution. This article interrogates Ilibagiza’s comprehension of forgiveness and its importance during the genocide and in post-genocide Rwanda. Left to tell centres on the power of religion, positive thinking and compassion as major steps towards forgiveness on an individual level, but shows limitations concerning justice after the commission of ‘crimes of state’, as Orentlicher (1991, 44) notes. Forgiveness is necessary in the healing process, but justice is a crucial component of national reconciliation. Forgiveness is only the first step towards restoring the humanity of the victim/ perpetrator, and should be followed by restorative justice.
Metrics
References
Buckley-Zistel, S. 2008. We are pretending peace: Local memory and the absence of social transformation and reconciliation in Rwanda. In After genocide: Transitional justice, post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond, ed. P. Clark and Z. Kaufman, . London: Hurst & Company.
Derrida, J., ed. 2001. On forgiveness. In On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness, page 25 – 60 part 1New York: Routledge.
Enright, R.D. 2001. Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Ilibagiza, I. with Erwin, S. 2006. Left to tell: Discovering God amidst the Rwandan holocaust. USA: Hay House, Inc.
Javangwe, T.D. 2013.The politics and poetics of writing self and nation in Zimbabwean autobiography. Harare: Africa Institute for Culture, Peace, Dialogue and Tolerance Studies.
Laub, D. 2009. Bearing witness or vicissitudes of listening failed empathy. History & Memory 21(1) (Spring/Summer): 127–150.
Lemarchand, R. 2008. The politics of memory in post-genocide Rwanda. In After genocide: Transitional justice, post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond, ed. P. Clark and Z. Kaufman, 65–76. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mamdani, M. 2001. When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691193830
Nora, P. 1989. Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations 26(special issue: Memory and counter-memory) (Spring): 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Orentlicher, D. 1991. Settling accounts: The duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. Yale Law Journal 100(8): 2537–2615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796903
Tadjo, V. 2002. The shadow of Imana: Travels in the heart of Rwanda. Trans. V. Wakerley. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Verdeja, E. 2004. Derrida and the impossibility of forgiveness. Contemporary Political Theory 3: 23–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300103
Zembylas, M. 2011. Mourning and forgiveness as sites of reconciliation pedagogies. Bioethical Inquiry 8: 257–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9316-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2016-11-18
Published 2017-02-24
