GENDER AND CULTURAL NEGOTIATION IN NINAH’S DOWRY: EXPLORING A CAMEROONIAN VIEW

Yvette Ngum

Abstract


The issue of identity is complex in Cameroon. As a nation with diverse cultures, people perform different identities in relation to the power that exist. Moreover, the situation is complicated by the historical colonisation of Cameroon by two different powers with different cultural identities, namely the English and the French. In such a context, where national identity is informed by a background of multicultural institutions, the performance of peoples’ identity is challenged by the hegemonies in place. Cameroonian cultural productions have responded to these situations, exposing and challenging the dominant hegemonies in place. Victor Viyuoh’s film, Ninah’s Dowry, is one of these. A work that deals with the trajectory of a woman caught in the web of patriarchy and other dominant practices, Viyuoh’s film gives room for a reading beyond this obvious thematic perspective. Using post-structuralist theory and psychoanalysis, I examine the display of domination, oppression and subordination in constructing gender identities in Ninah’s Dowry (2012). I argue that Ninah’s fate, in the work, is determined not only by the symbolic dowry system, which subjugates the woman, but also by the greed that underpins the whole marriage system.


Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Baumeister, R.F., K. Dale, and K.L. Sommer. 1998. Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation and denial. Journal of Personality. http://www2.sunysuffolk. edu/vollarj/baumesiter%20roy%20%20freudian%20defense%20mechanisms.pdf. (accessed September 8, 2016).

Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Butler, J. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4) (Dec):519-524. The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable.

Boeree, C.G. 2006. Personality theories. Sigmund Freud (1856 – 1939). Copyright 1997. http:// www.ship.edu/%7Ecgboeree/perscontents.html (accessed September 7, 2016).

Cornwall, A., and N. Lindisfare. 1994. Dislocating masculinity, gender, power and anthropology. In Dislocating masculinity: comparative ethnographies, eds Andrea Cornwall and Nancy Lindisfare. London.

Foucault, M. 1983. Why study power: the question of the subject. In Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd ed., eds M. Foucault, H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 212. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge, ed. Colin Gordon. Trans. Colin Gordon et al. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Foucault, M. 1994. Power, ed. James D. Faubion. Trans. Robert Hurley et al. New York: The New York Press.

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.

Freud, S. 1961. Beyond the pleasure. Trans. James Strachey. New York: Liveright.

Spivak, G.C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. eds. Carey Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.