CONTESTATION OF HEGEMONIES THROUGH PROPAGANDA THEATRE IN POST 2000 ZIMBABWE: THE CASE OF MAD¬ZOKA ZIMBABWE AND THE COUP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2078-9785/2845Keywords:
hegemonic actors, hegemonies, contestation, civil society, state, theatre, Madzoka Zimbabwe, The CoupAbstract
This paper discusses the state-) citizen contestations in Zimbabwe and examines the role of theatre in legitimising and/or resisting state hegemonies in the context of the post 2000 Zimbabwean cultural struggle. Using the theory of hegemony, the paper argues that, after ) the repossession of land by the majority of the black population in 2000 and the constitutional referendum held in February 2000, whose “No†vote challenged the hegemonic discourses and patriotic history of the ruling ZANU PF party, what followed was a largely polarised society split between the pro-hegemonic civic society such as ZNLWA on one hand, and an equally vociferous anti-hegemonic civic society that supported the ruling cultural formations (Raftopoulos and Mlambo 2009; Ravengai 2008). The pro-hegemonic(agree) civic society sought to stabilise and legitimise state authority and its discourses on sovereignty, land reform and the removal of sanctions, while counter-state hegemonic actors such as ZimRights agitated for the respect of human rights, constitutionalism and democracy. Individual theatre practitioners took a cue from these opposing civic society bodies and critically dialogued among themselves, thereby creating some form of binaries characterised by those who also sought to stabilise and maintain the prevailing status quo on one hand, and those that resisted and questioned the legitimacy of the prevailing hegemonies on other hand. In this paper, the polarised state of the theatre is represented by two opposing agitational propaganda performances, Madzoka Zimbabwe and The Coup.
Metrics
References
Primary Sources
Marange J. and A. Masungurudze, 2003. Madzoka Zimbabwe (Unpublished manuscript).
Makuwe, S. 2012. The Coup. (Unpublished manuscript).
Secondary Sources
Crow, B. and Banfield, C. 1996. An introduction to post-colonial theatre. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627675
Epskamp, P. K. 1989. Theatre in search of social change: the relative significance of different theatrical approaches. Hague: CESO.
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebook. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Howlett, D. 2005. Historians on defying hegemony in explaining nature relations. In Fides et Historia, Vol. XXXV11 (1): 17–24.
Innes, C.D. 1972. Erwin Piscator’s political theatre: the development of modern German drama. Cambridge University Press.
Kaarsholm, P. 1994. Mental colonization or catharsis? Theatre, democracy and cultural struggle from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. In Liz Gunner (Ed), Politics and performance: theatre, poetry and song in Southern Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press: 226–251.
Kershaw, B. 1992. The politics of performance: radical theatre as cultural intervention. London: Routledge.
Mda, Z. 1993. When people play people, development communication through theatre. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
Morton, A.D. 2007. Hegemony and passive revolution in the global economy: unravelling Gramsci. London: Pluto Press.
Thiong’o, Ngugi wa. 1977. Petals of blood. London: Heinemann.
Plastow, J. 1994. African theatre and politics: the evolution of theatre in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Johan¬nesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
Rabkin, G. 1964. Drama and commitment, politics in the American theatre of the thirties. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ranger, T. 2004. Nationalist historiography, patriotic history and history of the nation: the struggle over the past in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol 30(2): 215–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305707042000215338
Raftopoulos, B. and Mlambo, A. 2009. (ed). Becoming Zimbabwe: a history from the pre-colonial period to 2008. Harare: Weaver Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gmpr
Raftopoulos, B. 2006. The Zimbabwean crisis and the challenges for the left. Journal of Southern African Studies 32(2): 204–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070600655988
Ravengai, S. 2008. Political theatre under threat: the impact of POSA, AIPPA and censorship on theatre making in Zimbabwe. (Unpublished manuscript) Harare: Savannah Trust.
Sachikonye, L. M. 2002. Whither Zimbabwe? Crisis or democratisation. In Review of African Political Economy, 29(91): 13-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240208704581
Tendi, B.M. 2008. Patriotic history and public intellectuals critical of power. In Journal of South African Stud¬ies, Vol 34(2): 379–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070802038041
Vhutuza, E. and Ngoshi, H. T. 2008. Supranationalism or nationalism in the 21st Century? In The Integration Review, Vol 2(1): 177–187.
Vhutuza, E. 2011. Nationalism will never die: Zimbabwean discourses in the global age. In The African Inte¬gration Review, Vol 5(1): 79–101.
Zuckerman, B. 2008. State- society relations in Zimbabwe: patterns of continuity and change (Unpublished draft prepared for the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting) San Diego, CA.
Personal interviews
Majuru, W. 2012. Personal interview with William Mujuru, leader of Swerongoma theatre group.
Makuwe, S. 2012. Personal interview with Stanley Makuwe, New Zealand based playwright and director of The Coup.
Marange, J. 2012. Personal interview with Justin Marange, leader of the drama group comprised of war veterans.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
