Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

FORCE MAJEURE, CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND TERMINATION OF CONTRACT

Shiyuan Han

Abstract


It is impossible to draw a distinct line between force majeure and change of circumstances, because the two overlap. In order to regulate both force majeure and change of circumstances, the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) has adopted a unified model in article 79, whereas Chinese law adopts a dual model by treating them as different things and regulating them in different articles. Where the purpose of a contract becomes impossible to achieve because of a force majeure and both the CISG and Chinese Contract Law (the CCL) adopt the same model of termination of the contract, the contract should be terminated by one party with a notice to the other party instead of ipso facto avoidance. In a case of a change of circumstances, in order to terminate the contract, both the CISG and the CCL actually follow the path of raising an action by a notice of avoidance or termination to theother party. Both approaches have their merits and demerits but the differences between them in practice are not as large as presumed. Where force majeure and change of circumstances overlap each other, possible ways for termination of the contract are for a party either to choose their preferred solution or to follow the lex specialis derogat generali. The latter way is preferred in this article; and while in an action for termination the judge may balance the interests of both parties in making a final decision, the uniform application of the law, the safety of the transaction and the fairness of the judgment may be ensured in so doing.


Keywords


force majeure; change of circumstances; termination; Gestaltungsklagerecht; CISG; Chinese Contract Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atamer, YM. 2011. Article 79. In S Kröll, L Mistelis & P Perales Viscassillas (eds). UN convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG) Commentary. München: CH Beck.

Brox, H & Walker, Wolf-D. 2008. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.

Cui J. 2003. Contract law. Beijing: Law Press China.

Han, S. 2001. Contractual liabilities: Questions in dispute and relevant reflections. People’s Court Daily, 22 June.

Han, S. 2011. The law of contract. Beijing: Law Press China.

Han, S. 2013. The avoidance of contract under the CISG: Some comparative remarks from a Chinese perspective. In I Schwenzer & L Spagnolo (eds) Globalization versus regionalization, 4th Annual MAA Schlechtriem CISG Conference. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Han, S. 2014. Basic issues for understanding change of circumstances under Chinese law. Peking University Law Journal 26(3): 657, 672–673.

Huber, P. 2011. Article 49. In S Kröll, L Mistelis & P Perales Viscasillas (eds). UN convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG) commentary. München: CH Beck.

Liu, J. 2013. Legislation of tourism contract laws marks the advent of an upgrade to tourism development. Journal of Tourism (9)20.

Magnus. U. 2005. Art 79. In J. von Staudinger Kommentar zum BGB und Nebengesetzen: Wiener UN-Kaufrecht (CISG).

Schlechtriem. P & Schroeter, U. 2013. Internationales UN-Kaufrecht. 5. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Schwenzer, I. 2010. Force majeure and hardship in international sales contracts. Chinese translation by J. Yang, Tsinghua Law Journal 4(3): 164, 166–167. Schwenzer, I. 2013. Article 79. In P Schlechtriem & I Schwenzer (eds) Kommentar zum einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht: das Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über Verträge über den internationalen Warenkauf: CISG. 6. Aufl. München: CH Beck.

Shiomi, Y, Nakata, K & Matsuoka, H. 2010. Overview of international sale of goods convention. Kyoto: Horitsu Bunka Sha.

Teichmann, A. 2004. Key points in the modernization of German law of obligations. Chinese translation by Y. Lin, Law Review of National Chengchi University 79: 115.

Von Bar, C & Clive, E. 2009. Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law: Draft common frame of reference (DCFR), Vol I. München: Sellier European Law Publishers.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.