THE MODERN TRAVELLING MERCHANT: MOBILE COMMUNICATION IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAW

Authors

  • Ulrich G Schroeter University of Mannheim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/386

Keywords:

Mobile communication, electronic communication, contract law, electronic contract formation, m-commerce, place of contracting, conflict of laws, UN Electronic Communications Convention

Abstract

The use of mobile communication devices such as mobile phones, smartphones, tablet computers or notebooks with access to the internet has become an everyday phenomenon in today's business world. However, whenever mobile communications are used for the purposes of contract formation, that is, the mobile dispatch of offers or acceptances, the mobility of the communicating parties raises important difficulties for the application of traditional legal rules: The fact that messages transmitted via phone, email or SMS can be dispatched and received  at virtually any  place on  earth challenges the categories of private international law and international contract law, which are based on the (unspoken) assumption that parties communicate from their home country. The existing legal framework for cross-border contracts therefore hardly takes into account the possibility that parties may move across borders, and that the place of their communications may accordingly vary.

The present article addresses the legal difficulties and uncertainties that cross­ border  mobile communication  raises under international rules of law. It elaborates on the traditional role of the site of communication in this context before scrutinising how 'mobility friendly' the provisions  of the relevant  conventions  developed  by the United Nations, the Hague Conference for Private International Law and other organisations  are. In doing  so,  it critically  discusses  in particular  article  10(3)  of the UN Electronic Communications Convention of 2005, the most recent attempt at regulating mobile communications. Finally, it identifies a number of problems that have hitherto been overlooked (as notably the interaction of article 10(3) of the UN Electronic Communications Convention with traditional private international law rules on the formal validity of contracts) and proposes appropriate solutions.

References

Amstutz, M., Vogt, NP & Wang, M. 2007. Artikel 118. In H Honsell, NP Vogt, AK Schnyder & SV Berti (eds.) Basler Kommentar: Internationales Privatrecht, 2 ed. Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.

Bundesgerichtshof. 1982. Judgment of 2 June 1982, Docket No VIII ZR 43/81. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2730–2732.

Chong, KW & Chao, JS. 2006. United Nations Convention on the use of electronic communications in international contracts – A new global standard. Singapore Academy of Law Journal 18: 116–202.

Dicey, AV, Morris, JHC & Collins, L. 2012. The Conflict of Laws. 15 ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Eiselen, S. 2008. The purpose, scope and underlying principles of the UNECIC. In CB Andersen & UG Schroeter (eds). Sharing international commercial law across national boundaries: Festschrift for Albert H Kritzer on the occasion of his eightieth birthday. London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill, 106–133.

European Commission. 2005. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I) (presented by the Commission), COM(2005) 650 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Furmston, M & Tolhurst, GJ. 2010. Contract formation: Law and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, HD. 2006. The United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts: An overview and analysis. Uniform Law Review 285–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/11.2.285

Giuliano, M & Lagarde, P. 1980. Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations. Official Journal of the European Communities of 31 October 1980, No C 282, 1–50.

Gregory, JD. 2003. The proposed UNCITRAL Convention on Electronic Contracts. The Business Lawyer 59: 313–343.

Hay, P, Borchers, PJ & Symeonides, SC. 2010. Conflict of laws. 5 ed. St Paul: West.

Hay, P, Lando, O & Rotunda, R. 1985. Conflict of laws as a technique for legal integration. In M Cappelletti, M Seccombe & J Weiler (eds). Integration through law: Europe and the American federal experience. Vol 1: Methods, tools and institutions. Book 2: Political organs, integration techniques and judicial process. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 161–258.

Hettenbach, D. 2008. Das Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über die Verwendung elektronischer Mitteilungen bei internationalen Verträgen. Tűbingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151397-8

Honnold, JO. 1999. Uniform law for international sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention. 3 ed. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-03

How to Cite

Schroeter, Ulrich G. 2015. “THE MODERN TRAVELLING MERCHANT: MOBILE COMMUNICATION IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAW”. Journal of Law, Society and Development 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/386.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-09-01
Accepted 2015-09-01
Published 2015-09-03