SEARCH FOR AND SEIZURE OF EVIDENCE IN CYBER ENVIRONMENTS: A LAW-ENFORCEMENT DILEMMA IN SOUTH AFRICAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Authors

  • Vinesh M Basdeo National Diploma (Pol Management), BA Honours (Police Science), LLB, LLM, LLD College of Law UNISA
  • Moses Montesh National Diploma (Pol Management), BA Honours (Police Science), MPA, PhD (Police Science) College of Law UNISA
  • Bernard Khotso Lekubu College of Law UNISA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/874

Abstract

Investigating, deterring and imposing legal sanctions on cyber-criminals warrants an international legal framework for the investigation and prosecution of cybercrime. The real-world limits of local, state and national sovereignty and jurisdiction cannot be ignored by law-enforcement officials. It can be a strenuous task to obtain information from foreign countries, especially on an expedited basis – more specifically when the other country is in a different time zone, has a different legal system, does not have trained experts and uses different languages. In South Africa existing laws appear to be inadequate for policing the cyber realm. The effects and impact of information technology on the legal system have not yet received the attention they warrant. The challenges presented by the electronic realm cannot be solved merely by imposing existing criminal and criminal procedural laws which govern the physical world on cyberspace. The electronic realm does not necessarily demand new laws, but it does require that criminal actions be conceptualised differently and not from a purely traditional perspective. Sovereignty and the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of another state are fundamental principles grounding the relations between states; they constitute an important mechanism in the armoury of criminals. The harmonisation and enactment of adequate and appropriate transborder coercive procedural measures consequently play a pivotal role in facilitating effective international cooperation. This article examines the efficacy of South African laws in dealing with the challenges presented by police powers to search for and seize evidence in cyber environments. It analyses the rudimentary powers that exist in South African criminal procedure regarding the search for and seizure of evidence in cyber environments, and compares them against the backdrop of the more systemic and integrated approach proposed by the Cybercrime Convention.

References

D’Oliveira, J. 2003. ‘International co-operation in criminal matters: The South African contribution’ SA Journal of Criminal Justice. 16(3):323–369.

Kumar. 2010. ‘Africa could become the cybercrime capital of the world’. Available at http://www.psfk.com. Accessed 5 May 2011.

Marler, SL. 2002. ‘The Convention on Cybercrime: Should the United States ratify?’ New England Law Review. 11(1): 68–79.

Moore, RE. 2003. ‘Search and seizure of digital evidence: An examination of constitutional and procedural issues’. PhD thesis University of Southern Mississippi. http://aquila.usm.edu/theses_ dissertations

Nieman, A. 2006. ‘Search and seizure, production and preservation of electronic evidence’. LLD thesis North-West University. http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/1367

Proust, R. 2003. ‘International co-operation: A Commonwealth perspective’. SA Journal of Criminal Justice 16(3):295–310.

The Council of Europe ‘Cybercrime Convention Budapest 23.X1.2001 CETS No: 185’. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=185&CM=&DF=&CL=&CL=ENG. Accessed 10 June 2011.

United States Report of the President’s Working Group on Unlawful Conduct on the Internet ‘The Electronic Frontier: the Challenge of Unlawful Conduct Involving the Use of the Internet.’

Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/unlawful.htm. Accessed 27 January 2011.

Van der Merwe, DP. 2000. Computers and the Law (2 ed). Cape Town: Juta.

Volonino, P. 2003. ‘Electronic evidence and computer forensics’ Communications of the Association for Information Systems; 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01227

Wall, DS. 2003. Cyberspace Crime. Washington: Ashgate Publishing.

Whatis.com Definitions ‘Data’. Available at http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/Definition/0.sid5. Accessed 21 February 2011.

Whitcomb, CM. 2002. ‘A historical perspective of digital evidence: A forensic scientist’s view’ International Journal of Digital Evidence. 1(1):19–23

Downloads

Published

2014-09-01

How to Cite

Basdeo, Vinesh M, Moses Montesh, and Bernard Khotso Lekubu. 2014. “SEARCH FOR AND SEIZURE OF EVIDENCE IN CYBER ENVIRONMENTS: A LAW-ENFORCEMENT DILEMMA IN SOUTH AFRICAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE”. Journal of Law, Society and Development 1 (1):48-67. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/874.

Issue

Section

Articles