HARMONISING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN THE SADC

Authors

  • Stephen de la Harpe Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/876

Abstract

The promotion of international trade is seen as one of the important instruments to ensure development in developing nations and regions. The history of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the drafting of many regional and similar international trade agreements are evidence of this. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) is no exception.1 It is therefore strange that many states that are members of the WTO and actively encourage the opening up of international borders to free trade do not include public procurement2 in such free trade arrangements. This is particularly evident in developing states. If the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), which is a plurilateral agreement, is considered it is clear that many states do not wish to open their internal markets to competition in the public procurement sphere. It is therefore not surprising that public procurement has been described as the last rampart of state protectionism (Ky, 2012). Public procurement is an important segment of trade in any country (Arrowsmith & Davies, 1998). It is estimated that public procurement represents between 10% and 15% of the gross domestic product (GDP) of developed countries and up to 25% of GDP in developing states (Wittig, 1999). Unfortunately, governments often expect private industry to open up national markets for international competition but do not lead the way. Except for the limited use of pooled procurement,3 no specific provision is at present made for the harmonisation and integration of public procurement in the SADC. In view of the proximity of the member states, the interdependency of their economies and the benefits that can be derived from opening up their boundaries to regional competition in public procurement, the possibility of harmonisation and deeper integration in this sphere needs to be given more attention. The importance of public procurement in international trade and regional integration is twofold: first, it forms a substantial part of trade with the related economic and developmental implications; secondly, it is used by governments as an instrument to address socio-economic issues. Public procurement spending is also important because of its potential influence on human rights, including aspects such as the alleviation of poverty, the achievement of acceptable labour standards and environmental goals, and similar issues (McCrudden, 1999). In this article the need to harmonise public procurement in the SADC in order to open up public procurement to regional competition, some of the obstacles preventing this, and possible solutions are discussed. Reference is made to international instruments such as the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the Model Law on Public Procurement and the GPA. In particular, the progress made in the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) with regard to the harmonisation of public procurement, which was based on the Model Law, will be used to suggest possible solutions to the problem of harmonising public procurement in the SADC.

References

Anderson, RD, Pelletier, P, Osei-Lah, K & Müller, AC ‘Assessing the value of future accessions to the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: Some new data sources, provisional estimates, and an evaluative framework for WTO members considering accession’ 2011 Public Procurement Law Review 4:113–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1943405

Arrowsmith, S. ‘Transparency in public procurement: The objectives of regulation and the boundaries of the World Trade Organisation’ 2003 Journal of World Trade 283–303.

Arrowsmith, S. & Davies, A. (eds) Public procurement: Global revolution (London: Kluwer Law International 1998).

Arrowsmith, S. & Trybus, M. (eds) Public procurement: The continuing revolution (New York: Kluwer Law International 2002).

De la Harpe, SP le R ‘Public procurement: A critical analysis’ (LLD Thesis, Pretoria, UNISA 2009). e Silva, VGDL ‘The revision of the WTO agreement on government procurement: To what extent might it contribute to the expansion of current membership?’ 2008 Public Procurement Law Review 2:61–98.

Evenett, SJ & Hoekman, BM ‘Government procurement: Market access, transparency, and multilateral trade rules’ 2005 European Journal of Political Economy 21(1): 163–183. Available at http://programmes.comesa.int/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=21&Itemid=23&lang=en (accessed 3 June 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.01.001

http://www.comesa-eac-sadc-tripartite.org/. Accessed 2 June 2013.

http://www.sadc.int/about-sadc/overview/sadc-facts-figures/#GDP (accessed 3 June 2012).

http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/procurement_infrastructure/2011Model.html. Accessed 1 June 2013.

http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gp_gpa_e.htm 9. Accessed 1 June 2013.

Hunja, RR. 2003. Obstacles to Public Procurement Reform in Developing Countries. In: Arrowsmith, S. & Trybus, M. (eds.) Public Procurement: The Continuing Revolution. New York, Kluwer Law

International. Ch 2, 13–22.Karangizi, S.R. (2005) The COMESA public procurement reform initiative. Public Procurement Law Review, (3), 51–61.

Karangizi, SR. ‘The COMESA public procurement reform initiative’ 2005 Public Procurement Law Review 3:51–61.

Kovacs, A ‘The global procurement harmonisation initiative’ 2005 Public Procurement Law Review 1:15–38.

Ky, EP. Integration by public procurement: Harmonisation of public procurement policies in order to promote the regional integration. The experience in public procurement policies reform in West Africa and Monetary Union (WAEMU) in the aim to promote the regional trade between the members states. Paper delivered at the 5th International Public Procurement Conference Seattle, United States, August 2012 at 2149.

Lowenfeld, AF. International economic law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).

Matsushita, M. Schoenbaum, TJ & Mavroidis, PC The World Trade Organisation: Law, practice and policy. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003).

McCrudden, C. ‘International law and the pursuit of human rights: A framework for the discussion of the legality of “selective purchasing†laws under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement’ 1999 Journal of International Economic Law 3–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/2.1.3

Mosoti, V. ‘The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: A necessary evil in the legal strategy for development in the poor world?’ 2004 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 25(2):593–638.

Ortino, F. Basic legal instruments for the liberalisation of trade. A comparative analysis of EC and WTO law. Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan (RISDP) (2004). Available at http://www.sadc.int/documents-publications/show/936. Accessed 3 June 2013.

Pallas, CL. & Wood, J. ‘The World Bank’s use of country systems for procurement: A good idea gone bad?’ 2009 Development Policy Review 27(2):215–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00443.x

Reich, A. ‘The new GATT Agreement on Government Procurement – the pitfalls of plurilateralism and strict reciprocity’ 1997 Journal of World Trade 31(2):125–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD1997013

The SADC Regional Infrastructure Master Plan Energy Sector Plan August 2012. Available at http://www.sadc.int/. Accessed 3 June 2013.

Trepte, P. Regulating procurement: Understanding the ends and means of public procurementregulation. (New York: Oxford University Press 2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267751.001.0001

UNCITRAL: Origin, mandate and composition. Available at www.uncitral.org/ uncitral/en/uncitral_ texts/ procurement_infrastructure. Accessed 3 June 2013.

UNCITRAL Public Procurement. Available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/about/methods.html. Accessed 3 June 2013.

Wittig, WA. Building value through public procurement: A focus on Africa. UNCTAD/WTO(ITC) (1999). Available at http://www.acp-eu-trade.org/library/files/ Wittig%20-%201999%20-%20Building %20Value%(20Through%20Public%20Procurement %20A%20Focus%20on%20Africa.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2013.

Wittig, WA .‘Public procurement and the development agenda’ 2002 Public Procurement Law Review 3:71–83.

World Trade Organisation ‘Working party on Gatts rules referring to: The size of government procurement markets’ WTO document S/WPGR/W/39 12 July 2002 (02-3883), offprint from OECD Journal on Budgeting 1(4).

www.imf.org.http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2010&ey=2010&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=199&s=NGDP_R%2CGGX_NGDP&grp=0&a=&pr1.x=62&pr1.y=10 (accessed 2 June 2012).

Downloads

Published

2014-09-01

How to Cite

de la Harpe, Stephen. 2014. “HARMONISING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN THE SADC”. Journal of Law, Society and Development 1 (1):90-109. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/876.

Issue

Section

Articles