Enoch Book of Watchers and Astronomical Book: Theodicy in the Context of a Proto-Scientific Cosmology

Authors

  • Annette Evans University of the Free State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/3112

Keywords:

1 Enoch Book of Watchers, the Astronomical Book, pseudepigraphical literature,

Abstract

In the earliest book of 1 Enoch, the Astronomical Book, Enoch the “seer†exhorts the reader to contemplate cosmological phenomena. The book displays a keen interest in cosmology and meticulous observation of the natural world. Such characteristics still today form the foundation of the discipline of science. The second earliest Enochian writing, 1 Enoch Book of Watchers, in addition to proto-scientific observations, propounds an alternative explanation for the existence of evil to the traditional Christian belief in the doctrine of “original sin†as a result of the “fall†of Adam and Eve. The origin of evil is recognised to be divine, but the deity is exonerated from responsibility for it. There is an intriguing relation between the observations of natural phenomena, cosmology, divination, and angelic activity in these earliest Jewish apocalypses. This article considers the striking similarity between the use of proto-scientific elements in this pseudepigraphical literature to offer a solution to the vexed problem of theodicy, and the scientific observations that culminated more than two thousand years later in the new paradigm of evolution as the means of creation, and hence for understanding the inevitability of suffering and evil in cosmological terms.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alexander, P S. 2003. Enoch in millennial perspective. On the counter-cultural biography of an apocalyptic hero, in McNamara 2003:1–19.

Alexander, P S. 2014. Enoch and the beginnings of Jewish interest in natural science, in Ben-Dov and Sanders 2014:25–50.

Annus, A. 2010. Divination and interpretation of signs in the ancient world. Chicago, Illinois: The Oriental Institute of Chicago.

Ben-Dov, N and Sanders, S (eds) 2014. Ancient Jewish sciences and the history of knowledge in Second Temple literature. New York: New York University Press/Institute for the Study of the Ancient World.

Bocaccini, G. 2005. Enoch and Qumran origins. New light on a forgotten connection. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Boer, P A H (ed.) 1972. Congress Volume, Uppsala 1971. VTSup. 22. Leiden: Brill.

Boustan, R S and Reed, A Y. 2014. Heavenly realms and earthly realities in late antique religions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, W P. 2014. Wisdom’s wonder. Character, creation, and crisis in the Bible’s Wisdom literature. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Charlesworth, J H. 2003. Theodicy in early Jewish writings, in Laato and de Moor 2003:470–508.

Charlesworth, J H. 2005. Summary and conclusions: the books of Enoch or 1 Enoch matters: new paradigms for understanding pre-70 Judaism, in Boccaccini 2005:436–454.

Charlesworth, J H. (ed.) 2006. The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Princeton Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Vol. One, Scripture and the Scrolls. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

Collins, J J. 2003. Journeys to the world beyond in ancient Judaism, in McNamara 2003:20–36.

Collins, J J. 2016. Review of Ben-Dov and Sanders, Ancient Jewish sciences and the history of knowledge in Second Temple Literature. RBL 08/2016: SBL.

Cross, F M, Lemke, W E, and Miller, P D (eds) 1976. Magnalia Dei: the mighty acts of God. Essays on the Bible and archaeology in memory of G. Ernest Wright. New York: Doubleday.

Dodds, E R. 1951. The Greeks and the irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Evans, A H M. 2012a. As for the wheels, it was cried unto them in my hearing, “O wheelâ€: angelological and divinatory connections in Ezekiel 10:13, Journal for Semitics 21/2:222–236.

Evans, A H M. 2012b. Evangelism of young children: is an evolutionary understanding of “original sin†possible? OTE 25/1:84–99.

Evans, A H M. 2013. Interpreting the Bible for children in coherence with evolution, OTE 26/2 (2013): 315–333.

Evans, A H M. 2015. Two iconographical examples of sun-disc connections to the development of Jewish beliefs in angels, Journal for Semitics 24/1:20–35.

Ferguson, D. 2014. Creation. Guides to theology. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.

Gericke, J. 2013. A philosophical clarification of the axiological assumptions behind the concept of goodness in Genesis 1, Journal for Semitics 22/1:210–225.

Gruenwald, I. 1980. Apocalyptic and merkevah mysticism. Leiden: Brill.

Jovanovic, L. 2013. The Joseph of Genesis as Hellenistic scientist. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.

Knibb, M A. 1978. The Ethiopic book of Enoch. A new edition in the light of the Aramaic Dead Sea fragments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

McNamarah, M (ed.) 2003. Apocalyptic and eschatological heritage. The Middle East and Celtic realms. Dublin: Four Courts Press.

Metzger, B M and Collins, J J. 1994. Apocalyptic literature, in Metzger and Murphy 1994:362–363 (NT).

Metzger, B M and Murphy, R E (eds) 1994. The New Oxford annotated Bible. New Revised Standard Version. New York: Oxford University Press.

Milik, J T. 1976. The books of Enoch. Aramaic fragments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Muller, H P. 1972. Mantische Weisheit und Apokalyptik, in Boer 1972:268–293.

Murphy, F J. 2012. Apocalypticism in the biblical world. A comprehensive introduction. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic.

Nickelsburg, G W E. 2001. 1 Enoch. A commentary on the book of 1 Enoch, chapters 1–36, 81–108. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Nickelsburg, G W E. 2003. Judaism and Christian origins. Diversity, continuity and transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Nickelsburg, G W E. 2005. Response: context; text and social setting of the Apocalypse of Weeks, in Boccaccini, 234–241.

Nissenen, Marti. 2010. Prophecy and omen divination: two sides of the same coin, in Annus 2010:341–351.

Perdue, L G. 1994. Wisdom and creation: the theology of Wisdom literature. Nashville: Abingdon.

Reed, A Y. 2014a. Heavenly ascent, angelic descent, and the transmission of knowledge in 1 Enoch 6–16, in Boustan and Reed 2014:47–59.

Reed, A Y. 2014b. “Ancient Jewish sciences†in the historiography of Judaism, in Ben-Dov and Sanders 2014:195–253.

Sacchi, P. 2005. History of the earliest Enochic texts, in Boccaccini 2005:401–407.

Spangenberg, S. 2014. Kollig op Genesis 1–3: ’n Verslag van verskuiwende denke en geloof, OTE 27/2:612–636.

Stone, M. 1976. Lists of revealed things in the Apocalyptic literature, in Cross et al. 1976:414–452.

Stuckenbruck, L T. 2000. 4QEnoch ar. Discoveries in the Judaean Desert XXXVI. Qumran Cave 4 XXVI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stuckenbruck, L T 2014. The myth of rebellious angels: studies in Second Temple Judaism and New Testament text. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 335. Germany: Mohr Siebeck.

Tigchelaar, E J C and Garcia Martinez, F. 1998. 4QAstronomical Enoch. Discoveries in the Judaean Desert XXXVI. Qumran Cave 4 XXVI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Uehlinger, C and Trufaut, S M. 2001. Ezekiel 1, Babylonian Cosmological Scholarship and iconography: attempts at further refinement, Theologische Zeitschrift 2/57:140–171.

VanderKam, J C. 1984. Enoch and the growth of an apocalyptic tradition. Washington DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America.

VanderKam, J C. 1996. Chapter Two: I Enoch, Enochic motifs, and Enoch in early Christian literature, in VanderKam & Adler 1996:33–101.

VanderKam, J C. 2014. Enoch’s science, in Ben-Dov and Sanders 2014:51–68.

VanderKam, J C and Adler, W (eds) 1996. The Jewish apocalyptic heritage in early Christianity. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Van Huyssteen, J W. 2006. Alone in the world? Human uniqueness in science and theology. The Gifford Lectures, The University of Edinburgh, Spring, 2004. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.

Von Rad, G. 1968. Theology of the Old Testament volume 2. The theology of Israel’s prophetic traditions. Trl. D M G Stalker. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

Van Rooyen, J A. 2016. Why religious human beings need evolutionary epistomology! A theological and evolutionary viewpoint of “why humans need to embrace evolutionary epistomologyâ€, Verbum et Ecclesia 37/1:a1476. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1476.

Wyatt, N. 2001. Space and time in the religious life of the Near East. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Yarbro Collins, A. 1999. Apocalyptic themes in biblical literature, Interpretation 5/3:117–130.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-29

How to Cite

Evans, Annette. 2017. “Enoch Book of Watchers and Astronomical Book: Theodicy in the Context of a Proto-Scientific Cosmology”. Journal for Semitics 26 (1):177-93. https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/3112.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2017-08-24
Accepted 2017-08-29
Published 2017-08-29