A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST PREFIXED LETTER (1:1-1:10a) IN 2 MACCABEES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/3453Abstract
The text of 2 Maccabees has been fruitfully explored throughout the centuries. An aspect which scholars have struggled with is the significance of the two prefixed letters. The discussions on the reason for adding the letters are, however, mainly concerned with the respective authors, vocabulary and main ideas which are present in both the letters and the narrative. This article proposes an alternative approach to the problem. Through applying a rhetorical analysis to the first prefixed letter, the study explicates similarities in the communicative strategies applied in both the letter and the narrative. Both focus on a unified and ideal group who function as ambassadors for a specific purpose, and both employ the elements of threat and response in order to highlight important ideas. This will hopefully provide new insight into the reasons for attaching this letter to such a rhetorically effective narrative.
Metrics
References
Abel, F-M 1949. Les livres des Maccabées. EB. Paris: Gabalda.
Bickerman, E J 1927. Beiträge zur antiken Urkundengeschichte, I: Der Heimatsvermerk und die staatrechtliche Stellung der Hellenen im ptolemäishen Ägypten, Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete 8:216–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apf.1927.1927.8.216
_______ 1928. Makkabäerbücher (I. und II.), PW 14:779–797.
_______ 1933. Ein jüdischer Festbrief vom Jahre 124 v. Chr. (II Macc. 1:1–9), ZNW 32:233–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zntw.1933.32.3.233
_______ 1979. The God of the Maccabees: Studies in the Meaning and Origin of the Maccabean Revolt. SJLA 32; Leiden: Brill.
______ 1976–86. Studies in Jewish and Christian History. 3 vols; AGJU 9. Leiden: Brill.
Cigoi, A 1868. Historisch-chronologische Schwierigkeiten im zweiten Makkabäerbuche. Klagenfurt: Leon.
Coetzer, E 2014. A Rhetorical analysis of 2 Maccabees. Unpublished.
Dempsey, D 1990. The ‘Epistolary Perfect’ in Aramaic letters, BN 54:7–11.
Doran, R 1981. Temple propaganda: The purpose and character of 2 Maccabees. CBQMS 12. Washington, D. C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America.
_______ 2012. 2 Maccabees: a critical commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Enermalm-Ogawa, A 1987. Un langage de prière juif en grec: Le témeoignage des deux premiers livres des Maccabées. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Exler, F X J 1923. The form of the ancient Greek letter of the epistolary papyri (3rd c.B.C. – 3rd c.A.D.): a study in Greek epistolography. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Goldstein, J A 1983. II Maccabees. AB 41A. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780300261813
Habicht, C 1976. 2. Makkabäerbuch. JSHRZ I, 3. Gütersloh: Mohn.
Niese, B 1900. Kritik der beiden Makkabäerbücher: nebst beiträgen zur Geschichte der Makkabäischen Erhebung. Berlin: Weidmann.
Parker, V 2007. The letters in II Maccabees: reflections on the book’s composition, ZAW 119:386–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZAW.2007.028
Porter, S E 1994. καταλλάσσω in ancient Greek literature, with reference to the Pauline writings. Estudios de filologÃa Neotestamentaria 5. Cordoba: El Almendro de Cordoba.
Schwartz, D R 2008. 2 Maccabees (ed. L. T Stuckenbruck). Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter.
Spicq, C 1982. Notes de lexicographienéo-testamentaire. I–II + Supplément. OBO 22/1–3. Göttingen:
Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.
Torrey, C C 1940. The letters prefixed to Second Maccabees, JAOS 60:119–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/594004
Van Henten, J-W 1997. The Maccabean martyrs as saviours of the Jewish people: a study of 2 and 4 Maccabees (ed. J. Collins). Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004497542
Williams, J J 2013: Maccabean martyr traditions in Paul’s theology of atonement: did martyr theology shape Paul’s conception of Jesus’s death? Eugene: Wipf & Stock.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
