AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF STANDARDS IN UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1705Keywords:
library standards, performance measures, quality assurance, libraries, KenyaAbstract
This article sets out to describe the usage of standards in the development of quality library services in universities in Kenya. Standards represent opportunities for librarians to add value as information providers and for the library profession to raise its visibility as an authority on information quality. The mixed research method was used for data collection. A total of 27 (87%) of the 31 respondents from private and public higher education institutions (HEIs) completed and returned the questionnaires. Based on the findings from the questionnaire survey, five heads of university libraries were interviewed. The findings revealed that the majority of the university libraries had used only five out of the ten Commission for Higher Education’s Standards and Guidelines for University Libraries in Kenya (CHE 2007), namely: vision, mission and objectives; organisation and access of information resources; information resources; ICT resources; and library building. The higher usage of these five standards could have been attributed to the eligibility requirements for licensing of the external quality assurance regulatory body, namely, the CHE. However, the least utilised standards were those that were crucial to demonstrate that students had mastered the specific objectives of education. The CHE standards used for evaluation of university libraries in Kenya only covered inputs. The article concludes with a number of recommendations for improvement. The standards should focus on outputs and outcomes of the library programmes as primary indicators of quality.Metrics
References
ACRL see Association of College and Research Libraries.
ALA see American Library Association.
Altbach, PG, Reisberg, L & Rumbley, LE. 2009. Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution. Report prepared for the World Conference on Higher Education, 5–8 July, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004406155
American Library Association. 1998. Task force on academic library outcomes assessment report. http://www.ala.org/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/ALA_print_layout_136373.cfm
(Accessed 8 February 2007).
American Library Association. 2004. Standards for libraries in higher education. http://ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/ALA_print_layout_1_170127_170127.cfm (Accessed 11 August
.
Association of College and Research Libraries. 1989. Standards for university libraries: evaluation of performance. http://www.ala.org/acrl/acrlstandards/ (Accessed 11 August 2008).
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2012. Standards for libraries in higher education.
http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/fi les/content/standards/slhe.pdf (Accessed 29
January 2014).
Cameron, R. 2009. A sequential mixed model research design: design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 3(2):140–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.3.2.140
CHE see Commission for Higher Education.
CHEA see Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Cohen, L, Manion, L & Morrison, K. 2000. Research methods in education. 5th ed. London and
New York: Routledge Falmer.
Commission for Higher Education. 2007. Standards and guidelines for university libraries in
Kenya. Nairobi: CHE.
Commission for Higher Education. 2008. A handbook on processes, for quality assurance in higher education in Kenya. Nairobi: CHE.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation. 2002. Glossary of key terms in quality: assurance and accreditation. http://www.chea.org/international (Accessed 28 July 2008).
Creswell, JW. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches.
nd ed. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.
Creswell, JW. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among fi ve approaches.
nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cret, B. 2011. Accreditations as local management tools. Higher Education 61:415–429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9338-2
(Accessed 15 February 2011).
Cullen, R. 2001. Setting standards for library and information service outcomes, and service quality. Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, 12–16 August, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
US. http://www.libqual.org/documents/admin/cullen1.pdf (Accessed 9 May 2007).
Dalrymple, PW. 2001. Understanding accreditation: the librarian’s role in educational evaluation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2001.0004
Portal: Libraries and the Academy 1(1):32–32.
Derfert-Wolff, L, Gorski, M & Marcinek, M. 2005. Quality of academic libraries: funding bodies, librarians and users perspective: a common project of Polish libraries on comparable measures. Proceeding of the World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council, 14–18 August, Oslo, Norway. http://www.ifl a.org/ (Accessed 7 June 2007).
Dugan, RE & Hernon, P. 2002. Outcomes assessment: not synonymous with inputs and outputs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00339-7
Journal of Academic Librarianship 28(6):376–380.
ENQA see European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 2005. Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. http://enqa.eu/ (Accessed 30 January 2008).
Feilzer, MY. 2010. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Method Research 4(1):6–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
Gullikson, S. 2006. Faculty perceptions of ACRL’s information literacy competency standards for higher education. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(6):583–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.001
Harvey, L. 2004. Analytical quality glossary: quality research international. http://www.
qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/assurance htm (Accessed 28 July 2008).
Heu, N & Nelson, WN. 2009. A library compliance strategy for regional accreditation standards: using ACRL higher education standards with community and junior colleges in Western DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691310902762059
Association of Schools and Colleges. College and Undergraduate Libraries 16:250–277.
Johnson, RB & Onwuegbuzie, AJ. 2004. Mixed methods: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7):14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, RB, Onwuegbuzie, AJ & Turner, LA. 2007. Toward a defi nition of mixed method research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1:112–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Lindauer, BG. 2002. Comparing the regional accreditation standards: outcomes assessment and other trends. Journal of Academic Librarianship 28(1):14–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00280-4
Markless, S & Streatfi eld, D. 2006. Gathering and applying evidence of the impact of UK university libraries on student learning and research: a facilitated action research approach. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.10.004
International Journal of Information Management 26:3–15.
Martin, M & Stella, A. 2007. External quality assurance in higher education: making choices.
Paris: UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Materu, P. 2007. Higher education quality assurance in sub-Saharan Africa: status, challenges, opportunities and promising practices. African Region Human Development. World Bank DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7272-2
Working Paper, 124. Washington DC: World Bank.
Matthews, B & Ross, L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences.
Essex: Pearson Education.
Poll, R. 2005. Measuring the impact of new library services. Proceedings of World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council. 20–24 August 2006.
http://www.ifl a.org/ (Accessed 9 May 2007).
Poll, R. 2006. Impact measures for libraries and information services. Library Hi Tech 21(4):547– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610715419
Poll, R. 2008. Ten years after: ‘measuring quality’ revised. Performance Measurement and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040810869404
Metrics 9(1):26–37.
Republic of Kenya. 1985. Universities Act 1985, CAP. 210B. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Sanyal, B & Martin, M. 2007. Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: an overview. In
Higher education in the world: accrediting for quality assurance: what is at stake? New
York: Global University Network for Innovation:3–17.
Saunders, L. 2008. Perspectives on accreditation and information literacy as refl ected in the literature of library and information science. Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(4):305– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.05.003
Scheeder, D. 2005. Information quality standards: navigating the seas of misinformation.
Proceedings of World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council, 28 September, Oslo, Norway. http://www.ifl a.org/ (Accessed 5 May 2007).
UNESCO see United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization.
United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization. 2006. Making basic choices for external quality assurance systems. (External quality assurance: options for higher education managers). Paris: UNESCO/IIEP.
United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization. 2010. Communique: 2009 World
Conference for Higher Education: the new dynamics of higher education and research for societal change and development, 5–8 July 2009, Paris, France.
Weiner, S. 2005. Library quality and impact: is there a relationship between new measures and traditional measures? Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(5):432–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.05.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
