Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Web 2.0 Technologies by Library and Information Science Students

Colin Zinyeredzi, Sandy Zinn

Abstract


This research investigated the use of Web 2.0 technologies by Library and Information Science (LIS) students at the University of the Western Cape (UWC). Blumer and Katz’s (1974) Uses and Gratification Theory, which explains the reasons behind people’s use of Web 2.0 technologies, was used to provide meaning to the research findings. A mixed methods case study approach was used to collect data by means of a questionnaire, content analysis and interviews.  Findings revealed that between 72% and 97% of LIS students have accounts on the following Web 2.0 technologies: YouTube, Skype, Google Apps, WhatsApp, Twitter and Facebook. This research highlighted that LIS students use Web 2.0 technologies for both academic and general purposes. Over 80% of the LIS students use Web 2.0 technologies for entertainment, keeping up-to-date, and meeting people as well as for communication with peers and lecturers. Analysis of the LIS Department’s curriculum documents, assignments as well as key informant interviews revealed that elements of Web 2.0 technologies are embedded in some of the LIS modules. Ninety five per cent of the LIS students supported the inclusion of Web 2.0 technologies in the LIS curriculum. 


Keywords


Web2.0; uses and gratification theory; social media; LIS students; Library2.0

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aharony, N. 2009. The influence of LIS students’ personality characteristics on their perceptions towards Web 2.0 use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 41(4): 227-242.

AI-Daihani, S. 2009. The knowledge of Web 2.0 by library and information science academics. Education for Information, 27(1): 39-55.

Ajjan, H. and Hartshorne, R. 2008. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education 11(2):71-80.

American Library Association (ALA). 2013. DRAFT revised standards for accreditation of Master’s programs in library and information studies. Committee on Accreditation of the American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/sites/ala.org.accreditedprograms/files/content/standards/Standards_Draft_for_comment_for_RELEASE.pdf (accessed December 30, 2016).

An, Y., Aworuwa, B., Ballard, G. and Williams, K. 2009. Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and bet practices. http://www.aect.org/pdf/proceedings09/2009/09_1.pdf (accessed December 30, 2016).

An, Y. J., and Williams, K. 2010. Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers, and lessons learned. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 7(3): 41-48.

Barnet, L., Collis, E., Narborough, J., Parry, F., Peel, C., Shields, C., Stubbings, R. and Walton, W. 2010. Use of Web 2.0 tools by students at Loughborough University. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/www/lboroacuk/library/downloads/surveyresults/Web2.0tools.pdf (accessed April 27, 2014).

Bawden, D., Robinson, L., Anderson, J., Bates, J., Rutkauskiene, U. and Vilar, P. 2007. Towards curriculum 2.0: Library/information education for a Web 2.0 world. Library and Information Research 31(99): 14-25.

http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/index.php/lir/article/view/49 (accessed December 30, 2016).

Blumer, J. G. and Katz, E. 1974. The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Berverly Hills, California: Sage.

Chow, A. S., Shaw, T. L., Gwynn, D., Martensen, D. and Howard, M. 2011. Changing Times and Requirements: Implications for LIS Education. Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal 21(1): 2-20. http://www.libres-ejournal.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Vol21_I1_Chow_Shaw_Gwynn_Martensen_Howard_REF_LIBRES21n1.pdf (accessed December 30, 2016).

Chu, H. 2006. Curricula of LIS programs in the USA: A content analysis. Palmer School of Library & Information Science, Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice (A-LIEP), Singapore, 3-6 April 2006. 328- 337. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105144 (accessed December 30, 2016).

Chua, A.Y.K and Goh, D.H. 2010. A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research 32(3):203 – 211.

Combes, B., Hanisch, J., Carroll, M., Hughes, H. & Millington, A. 2011. Are we there yet? Students have their say about library and information science education in Australia and twenty-first century learning. IASL Conference Reports, pp.1-11.

Covili, J. 2012. Going Google: Powerful tools for 21st century learning. London: Sage publications.

De Vargas, L.S., De Lara, M.V.S., Gonçalves, R., Das Neves, B.S. and Mello-Carpes, B.P. 2014. The use of Facebook as a tool to increase the interest of undergraduate students in physiology in an interdisciplinary way. Advances in Physiology Education 38(3): 273 – 276.

Eighmey, J. and McCord, L. 1998. Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the World Wide Web. Journal of Business Research 41(3): 187-194.

Foo, S. and Ng, J. 2008. Library 2.0, Libraries and Library School. Proc. Library Association of Singapore Conference, Singapore, May 8-9.

http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/sfoo/publications/2008/2008LAS-SF-JN_fmt.pdf (accessed December 22, 2016).

Garoufallou, E. and Charitopoulou, V. 2011. The use and awareness of Web 2.0 tools by Greek LIS students. New Library World 112(12): 490 – 498.

Garoufallou, E. and Charitopoulou, V. 2012. Web 2.0 in library and information science education: the Greek case. New Library World 113(3/4): 202 – 217.

Harris, A. L and Rea, A. 2010. Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education 20(2): 137 – 144.

Hicks, A. and Graber. A. 2010. Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and Web 2.0. Reference Services Review 38(4): 621 -633.

Huang, E. 2008. Use and gratification in e-consumers. Internet Research 18(4): 405- 426.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). 2012. Guidelines for professional library/information educational programs. http://www.ifla.org/publications/guidelines-for-arofessional-libraryinformation-educational-programs-2012 (accessed 12 March 2014).

Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D. and Siorenta, A. 2013. Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Towards a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29(2): 248 – 267. http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/submission/index.php/AJET/article/view/ 157/ 55 (accessed December 22, 2016).

Library and Information Services (LIS) transformation charter. 2014. Pretoria: Department of Arts and Culture (DAC) and National Council for Library and Information Services (NCLIS). http://www.nlsa.ac.za/Downloads_01/2014_Final_LIS_Transformation_Charter.pdf (accessed December 22, 2016).

Maloney, E. 2007. What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning? Chronicle of Higher Education, 25(18): 39.

Matingwina, T. 2014. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of university students on Web 2.0 tools: implications for academic libraries in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Science & Technology 9(6):59 – 72. http://www.nust.ac.zw/zjst/index.php/volume-9-2014# (accessed December 16, 2016).

Mishra, S. 2009. Social networking technologies (SITs) in digital environment: Its possible implications on libraries. http://eprints.rclis.org/16844/1/Social%20networking%20in%20Library.pdf (accessed December 19, 2016).

Murugesan, S. 2007. Understanding Web 2.0. https://91-592-722.wiki.uml.edu/file/view/understanding_web_20.pdf (accessed December 18, 2016).

Nagatsuka, T., Tsunoda, H. and Harada, T. 2013. The improvements in quality of LIS education through the mutual international exchange of students in the East Asia. IFLA WLIC. http://library.ifla.org/155/1/199-nagatsuka-en.pdf (accessed December 18, 2016).

NMC Horizon Report. 2014 Higher education edition. http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN-SC.pdf (accessed December 18, 2016).

Noh, Y. Ahn, I. and Choi, S. 2012. A study of changes in the library and information science curriculum with evaluation of its practicality. Journal of Academic Librarianship 38(6):348-364.

Ocholla, D. and Bothma, T. 2007. Library and information education and training in South Africa. New Library World 108(2): 149 – 169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800710722180

Raju, R. 2005. LIS education and training in South Africa: A historical review. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 71(1): 74–84.

Raju, R. 2013. The LIS school in the ICT age: A casualty, or a catalyst for a paradigm shift?- the case of South Africa. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, 17- 23 August. http://library.ifla.org/177/1/199-raju-en.pdf.

Richardson, W. 2010. Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful Web tools for classrooms. 3rd ed. London: Corwin.

Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication & Society 3(1): 3–37.

Sarrafzadeh, M., Hazeri, A. and Alavi, S. 2011. The status of Web 2.0 in Iran’s LIS Education. In F. M. Nadzar, M. S. Saad, & S. Abdullah (Ed.), Proceeding of Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education and Practice: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities, (pp. 1-8). Faculty of Information Management & Tun Abdul Razak Library Pullman Putrajaya Lakeside, Malaysia.

Sawant, S. 2012. The study of the use of Web 2.0 tools in LIS education in India. Library Hi Tech News 12(2): 11-15.

Schroeder, J. and Greenbowe, T. J. 2009. The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 5(4):1-7.

Shao, G. 2009. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research 19(1): 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927795

Srivastava, R. 2009. Web 2.0 in LIS curriculum: a preliminary study. Paper presented at the 7th international CALIBER. http://www.inflibnet.ac.in/caliber2009/CaliberPDF/47.pdf (accessed December 17, 2016).

Stafford, T. F. and Schkade, L. 2004. Determining uses and gratifications for Internet. Decision Sciences Spring 35(2): 259-280.

Theimer, K. 2010. Web 2.0 tools and strategies for archives and local history collections. London: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.

Tumuhairwe, G. K. 2013. Analysis of library and information science/studies (LIS) education today: The inclusion of indigenous knowledge and multicultural issues in LIS curriculum. IFLA WLIC. http://library.ifla.org/276/1/125-tumhuwaire-en.pdf. (accessed December 17, 2016).

University of Cape Town. 2013. Postgraduate Diploma in Library and Information Studies course outline. http://www.lisc.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/40/Course-Outline-for-2013-Curriculum.pdf (accessed December 22, 2016).

University of the Western Cape, Department of Library and Information Science. 2015. Master’s in Library and Information Studies. https://sites.google.com/site/mlibinfostudies/home (accessed December 16, 2016).

Virkus, S. 2008. Use of Web 2.0 technologies in LIS education: experiences at Tallinn University, Estonia. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems 42(3):262-274.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00330330810892677

Wolske, M. 2013. LIS Education Q and A with Martin Wolske, 2011 LJ Teaching Award Winner. http://ischool.illinois.edu/articles/2013/04/wolske-honored-caepe-award (accessed December 22, 2016).

World Wide Worx and Student Brands. 2013. Social media: addiction and boon to students. http://www.worldwideworx.com/hightech-students/ (accessed December 16, 2016).

YouTube Data. 2007. Most popular YouTube channels. http://youtubedata.com/statistics.php (accessed March 16, 2014).

Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G. and Yuen, P. K. 2011. Perceptions, interest, and use: Teachers and web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 7(2):109-123.

Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Abu S.B., Omar, S. Z., Bolong, J. and Kamarudin, N.A. 2014. Addictive Facebook use among university students. Asian Social Science 10(6): 107-116.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/2034

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.