Challenges and Opportunities Related to Quality Distance Higher Education in Zimbabwe

Authors

  • George Nervious Shava North West University Potchefstroom Campus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/1178

Keywords:

distance education, higher education, quality education, teaching and learning,

Abstract

Zimbabwe has managed to respond to the movement in support of UNESCO’S lifelong learning concept and strategy that seeks to widen and deepen access to higher education through distance education initiatives. Despite the significant increase in students enrolling in distance education institutions, the gold standard of excellence that is sought by many nations has gradually been compromised. There are symptoms of a downward trend in terms of quality in open distance learning institutions. The qualitative study analysed major factors affecting the provision of quality distance higher education with specific reference to the Zimbabwe Open University, the sole provider of university distance education in Zimbabwe. The study focused on three Zimbabwe Open University regional centres in Zimbabwe. The paper seeks to identify major factors contributing to the declining quality of distance education and discusses measures that distance education providers in Zimbabwe can undertake in order to promote excellence for effective learning in the 21st century. The study established that several factors are affecting the quality of distance education in Zimbabwe. The lack of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) facilities at regional and district centres was a major hindrance to effective teaching and learning.

References

Barret, B. 2010. Virtual Teaching and Strategies: Transitioning from Teaching Traditional Classes to Online Classes. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 3(12): 17-20

https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i12.919

Bates, A. W. 1995. Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. New York: Routledge.

Bryant, A., and K. Charmaz. 2007. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941

Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Chickering, A. W., and Z. Gamson. 1987. Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin3: 3-7.

Corry, M. 2008. Quality in Distance Learning. Distance Learning 5(1): 88-91

Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Daiziel, C. 1994. New Connection: A College President's Guide to Distance Education. Washington: Instructional Telecommunications Council.

Elias, T. 2012. Universal Instructional Design Principles for Moodle. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning 11(2) http://www.irrodl.org/inex.phd/irrod/article/view869/1575 (accessed June 15, 2017).

Holton, J. A. 2010. The Coding Process and its Challenges. London: Sage.

Kirkpatrick, K. P. 2005. Quality Assurance in Open and Distance Learning. https://www.col.org/resources/quality-assurance-open-and-distance-learning (accessed June 15, 2017).

Koul, B. N. 2005. Perspectives on Distance Education: Towards a Culture of Quality. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.

Moore M. G. and G. Kearsely. 1996. Distance Education: A System View of Online Learning. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Patton, M. Q. 2001. Evaluation in Education. London: Longmans.

Pereira, L. 2012. A Critical Realist Exploration of the Implementation of a Curriculum in Swaziland. PhD Thesis, Rhodes University.

Rikers, R. M. J. P. 2006. A Critical Reflection on Emerging Topics in Cognitive Load Research. Appl. Cognie. Psycho 20: 359 – 364. Doi: 10.1002/acp.1252

https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1252

Rogers, P., G. Berg, J. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, and K. Schenk, eds. 2009. Encyclopaedia of Distance Learning. 2nd Edition. London: Information Sciences References.

SAUVCA's National Quality Assurance Forum. 2002. Quality Assurance in South African Universities: Views from the SUVCA's National Quality Assurance Forum. Pretoria: SAUVCA

Silverman, D. 2014. Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage.

Simonson, M. 2012. Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Boston: Pearson.

Simonson, M., C. Schlosser and A. Orellana. 2011. Distance Education Research: a Review of the Literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23 (2-3): 124-142. Doi: http://dx.doc.org/10.1..7/512525-011-9045-8

Willis, B. 1993. Distance Education: A Practical Guide. Englewood Cliffs:: Educational Technology Publication.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-25

How to Cite

Shava, George Nervious. 2016. “Challenges and Opportunities Related to Quality Distance Higher Education in Zimbabwe”. Progressio 38 (2):47-62. https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/1178.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-06-07
Accepted 2017-05-02
Published 2017-07-25