FIGHTING OVER NDEBELE IDENTITY THROUGH ONLINE FORUMS: QUARRELS OF THE VANQUISHED?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1016-8427/709Abstract
Social media has transformed into a space of contest for identity, language and culture. In an attempt to reclaim, redefine and restore their distorted identity, the Ndebele people have taken to the use of social media as a forum to fulfil their quest. Unlike most cultures and identities the concept of Ndebeleness is a fluid ideology, because the concept of Nationalism in this culture involved a unification of various identities which in itself caused an identity divide in the Ndebele ideology. More recently the identity debates are centered on the concept of ‘who is Ndebele and who is an outsider?’ This article reflects on and discusses key ideas and cross-cutting themes around the evolution of ‘cultures’, discursive practices and other ‘language forms’ in Zimbabwe that have in recent years played a significant role in shaping ideas about Ndebele identity and the other. The research analyses these concepts using facets of critical discourse analysis as well as Primordial and Constructivist theories of identity. The article uses data collected from various social media forums for analysis purposes.
References
Bayar, M. 2009. Reconsidering primordialism: An alternative approach to the study of ethnicity. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(9): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870902763878
Hadebe, S. 2001. The songs of Lovemore Majayivana and Ndebele oral literature. In African oral literature: Functions in contemporary contexts, ed. R.H. Kaschula, 16–29. Claremont: New African Educational Books.
Horowitz, D. 2002. The deadly ethnic riot. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342057
Kaschula, R., ed. 2001. African oral literature: Functions in contemporary contexts. Claremont: New African Educational Books.
Mazarire, G.C. 2003. Who are the Ndebele and Kalanga in Zimbabwe? Paper prepared for Konrad Adenauer Foundation Project on Ethnicity in Zimbabwe, November.
Mckay, J. 1992. An exploratory synthesis of primordial and mobilization approaches to ethnic phenomena. Ethnic and Racial Studies5: 395–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1982.9993387
Msindo, E. 2002. Transformations in Kalanga and Ndebele societies, 1890–1990. Oxford: Public Affairs Ltd.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2008b. Inkosi yinkosi ngabantu: An interrogation of governance in precolonial Africa – the case of the Ndebele of Zimbabwe. Southern African Humanities Journal20: 1–23.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2008b. Nation-building in Zimbabwe and the challenges of Ndebele particularism. African Journal of Conflict Resolution8(3): 27–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcr.v8i3.39430
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2011. The Zimbabwean nation-state project: A historical diagnosis of identity- and power-based conflicts in a postcolonial state. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.49596
Ranger, T.1999. Voices from the rocks: Nature, culture and history in the Matopos Hills of Zimbabwe. Harare: Baobab.
Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Turkle, S. 2012. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Wolff, S. 2006. Ethnic conflict: A global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yang, P.Q. 2000. From ethnic studies: Issues and approaches. New York: State University of New York Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher's business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution's website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to reuse all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Accepted 2015-12-07
Published 2016-04-18