Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

When the State Fails: The Role of the Khulumani Support Group in Obtaining Reparations for Victims of Apartheid

Mia Swart

Abstract


‘Politics begins when one decides not to represent victims … but to be
faithful to those events during which victims politically assert themselves.’Alain Badiou (1985). Peut on penser la politique?
It is argued that one should not look at the state as the sole actor capable of delivering justice in transitional and post-transitional contexts. Victim organisations can be equally well equipped as and, in certain contexts, better equipped than the state to represent the interests of victims and to assist in formulating reparation policies.

Keywords


reparations; victims; transitional justice; Khulumani; Truth and Reconciliation Committee; civil society; victim organsiations; Alien Tort Claims Act

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abel R, Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle against Apartheid, 1980–1994 (Routledge 1995).

Allison S, ‘The President’s Fund: Where is the Money for Apartheid Victims actually going?’ (2014) .

Alston P, ‘The Not-a-cat Syndrome’ in Philip Alston, Non-state Actors and Human Rights (OUP 2005).

Amadiume I and An-Na’im A, The Politics of Memory: Truth, Healing and Social Justice (University of Chicago Press 2000).

Barnes C, ‘Weaving the Web: Civil Society Roles in working with Conflict and Building Peace’ in Paul van Tongeren (ed), People building Peace II: Successful Stories of Civil Society (Lynne Riener 2005).

Bazyler M and Alford R, Holocaust Restitution: Perspectives on the Litigation and its Legacy (NYU Press 2007).

Black Sash, .

Bohler Muller N, ‘Reparations for Apartheid era Human Rights Abuses: The Ongoing Struggle of Khulumani Support Group’ (2013) Speculum Juris.

Braithwaite J, ‘Restorative Justice and De-professionalization’ (2004) 13(1) The Good Society 28.

Burkhardt M, ‘Victim Participation before the International Criminal Court’ (2010), PhD thesis, Humboldt University of Berlin .

Cardenas S, Human Rights in Latin America: A Politics of Terror and Hope (University of Pennsylvania Press 2011).

Chanock M, The making of South African Legal Culture 1902–1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice (CUP 2001).

Coalition on Civil Society Resource Mobilisation, Critical Perspectives on Sustainability of the South African Civil Society Sector (2012) .

De Greiff P, The Handbook of Reparations (OUP 2006).

Dugard J, ‘Dealing with the Crimes of a Past Regime. Is Amnesty still an Option?’ (1999) 12(04) Leiden Journal of International Law 1001.

Durbach A, ‘An Essential Intervention: Civil Society Responses to redressing and preventing Violence against Women in Post-apartheid South Africa’. In Sarah Williams and Hannah Woolaver (eds), Civil Society and International Criminal Justice in Africa (Juta 2016).

Dupuy PM, ‘Article 34’ in Andreas Zimmermann, Christian Tomuschat and Karin Oellers-Frahms (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (OUP 2006).

Echeverria G, Reparation: A Sourcebook for Victims of Torture and Other Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (REDRESS Trust 2003).

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), ‘In the Government Representation before the European Court of Human Rights: Third Party Intervention section’ .

Evans C, ‘Reparations for Victims in International Criminal Law’ (nd) .

Falk R, On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics (Penn State University Press

.

FIDH, ‘Enhancing Victims’ Rights before the ICC?’ (2013) .

Fischer M, ‘Civil Society in Conflict Transformation: Strengths and Limitations’ (2011) Advancing Conflict Transformation, 287 .

Goodman R and Jinks D, ‘How to influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law’ (2004) 54 Duke Law Journal 621.

Gurd K, and Manjoo R, ‘The Need for a New Narrative: Challenging Hegemonic Meanings of Human Rights Violations in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ in R Chandler, L Wang and L Fuller (eds), Women, War, and Violence: Personal Perspectives and Global Activism (Palgrave 2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230111974_6.

Hamber B, ‘The Dilemmas of Reparations: In Search of a Process-driven Approach’ in K de Feyter, S Parmentier, M Bossuyt and P Lemmens (eds), Out of the Ashes: Reparations for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations (Intersentia 2005).

Hayner P, Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions (Routledge 2010).

Hoelker V, ‘The Impact of Human Rights Mobilisation on Columbia’s Peace and Justice Law’ (2016) .

International Criminal Court, ‘Guidelines governing the Relations between the Court and Intermediaries: For the Organs and Units of the Court and Counsel working with Intermediaries’ (2014) .

International Criminal Court, ‘Victims before the International Criminal Court: A Guide for the Participation of Victims in the Proceedings of the Court’ .

Kaldor M, Global Civil Society: An Answer to War (Wiley 2003).

Kamminga MT, ‘The evolving Status of NGOs under International Law’ in P Alston, Non-state Actors and Human Rights (Oxford 2005).

Kesselring R, Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory and Emancipation in Post-apartheid South Africa (Stanford University Press 2016).

Khulumani Support Group (KSG) accessed 7 August 2017.

Khulumani Support Group (KSG), ‘A Reparations Campaign Update from Khulumani Support Group – 17 November 2011’ (2011) .

Khulumani Support Group (KSG), ‘Khulumani expresses Profound Disappointment at Government’s Reparation Regulations’ (2011) .

Khulumani Support Group (KSG), ‘Memorandum handed over to the Office of the President in Pretoria on Tuesday, 20 March 2012’ (2012) .

Lykes M, Tereblanche M and Hamber B, ‘Narrating Survival and Change in Guatemala and South Africa: The Politics of Representation and a Libertarian Community Psychology’ (2003) 31(1–2) American Journal of Community Psychology 79–90.

Madlingozi T, ‘Transitional Justice Entrepreneurs and the Production of Victims’ (2010) 2(2) Journal of Human Rights Practice 208.

Makhalemele O, ‘Southern Africa Reconciliation Study: Khulumani Case Study’ (CSVR Project 2004) .

McEvoy K, ‘Beyond Legalism: Towards a Thicker Understanding of Transitional Justice’ (2007) Journal of Law and Society 421.

Meernik J, ‘The Impact of Human Rights Organizations on Naming and Shaming Campaigns’ (2012) 56(2) Journal of Conflict Resolution 233.

Moon C, ‘Reconciliation as Therapy and Compensation: A Critical Analysis’ in Scott Veitch (ed), Law and the Politics of Reconciliation (Routledge 2007).

Mutua M, Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique (University of Pennsylvania Press 2005).

Paul J, ‘Global Policy Making’ (2000) .

Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee, Report volume 6, section 2, chapter 1 (1998) .

Rombouts H, Victim Organisations and the Politics of Reparation: A Case Study (Intersentia 2004).

Rustomjee C, Jubilee South Africa (2004) 13 .

Shelton D and Ingadottir T, ‘The International Criminal Court Reparations to Victims of Crimes (Article 75 of the Rome Statute) and the Trust Fund (Article 79)’ (New York University Centre of International Cooperation 1999) .

South Africa, Department of Justice, ‘A Summary of Reparation and Rehabilitation Policy, including Proposals to be considered by the President’ accessed 7 August 2017.

Stacy H, Human Rights for the 21st Century: Sovereignty, Civil Society, Culture (Stanford University Press 2009).

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .

Swart M, ‘Requiem for a Dream? The Impact of Kiobel on Apartheid Reparations in South Africa’ (2015) 13(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice 353.

Teitel R, Globalising Transitional Justice (OUP 2014).

Van der Merwe H, Dewhirst P and Hamber B, ‘Non-governmental Organisations and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: An Impact Assessment’ (1999) Politikon 62.

Van der Merwe H, Dewhirst P and Hamber B, ‘Non-governmental Organisations and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: An Impact Assessment’. Research report written for the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (1999).

Van Zyl P, ‘Dilemmas of Transitional Justice: The Case of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ (1999) Journal of International Affairs 647.

Vielajus M and Haeringer N, Transnational Networks of ‘Self-representation’: An Alternative Form of Struggler for Global Justice (Rowman and Littlefield 2016).

White G, ‘Civil Society, Democratisation and Development: Clearing the Analytical Ground’ in Peter Burnell and Peter Calvert (eds), Civil Society in Democratization (Psychology Press 2004).

World Bank, Gender, Justice and Truth Commissions (2006) .

Cases

Azanian People’s Organisation (Azapo) v President of South Africa 1996 CCT 17/96 ZACC 16.

Balintulo v Daimler AG 2013 727 F 3d 174, 192 (2d Cir).

Doe I v Unocal Corp 2002 395 F3d 932, 967 (9th Cir).

Khulumani v Barclays National Bank Ltd 2007 504 F 3d 254 (2d Cir).

Khulumani et al v Barclays et al, Amended Complaint, United States District Court 2008.

Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co 2013 133 S Ct 1659 (No 10 1491).

Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co 2013 569 US.

Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) 2002 (5) SA 703 (CC).

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of SA. In re: Ex parte Application of the President of the RSA 2003 (3) BCLR 241 (CC), 2000 (2) SA 674 (CC).

Presbyterian Church of Sudan v Talisman Energy, Inc, 2009 582 F 3d 244, 259 (2d Cir).

Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, judgment on the appeal against the decision establishing the principles and procedures to be applied to reparations of 7 August 2012 with amended order for reparations (Annex A) and public annexes 1 and 2 2005 ICC-01/04-01/06-3129.

Sosa v Alvarez Machain 2004 124 SCt 2739.

South African Apartheid Litigation, In re, 2003 346 F Supp 2d 538, 547 (SDNY).

South African Apartheid Litigation, In re, 2009 617 F Supp 2d. 228 (SDNY).

United States Court of Appeals for the second circuit 2013 No 09-2778 .

The United States of America v the State of Georgia, Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss 2009 Civil Action No 1:10-CV-0249-CAP 6 .

Legislation

Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995 Chapter 2 section 3(3)(c).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/2929

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.