Better Late than Never: Lessons from S v Jordan in Strengthening Women's Participation in Litigation

Authors

  • Amanda Spies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3591

Keywords:

sex work, gender equality

Abstract

In 2002 the South African Constitutional Court rejected the decriminalisation of sex work and for many years the judgment has constricted further debate on the topic. In 2013 organisations such as the Commission for Gender Equality have again publicly committed themselves toward lobbying for the decriminalisation of sex work. The renewed debate has necessitated a reconsideration of the Court's decision in S v Jordan and this article focuses on the organisations that participated as amicus curiae in the matter. The discussion highlights the importance of organisational participation in litigation and how this participation could provide the context in which to consider future debates on the topic.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Amanda Spies

In 2002 the South African Constitutional Court rejected the decriminalisation of sex work and for many years the judgment has constricted further debate on the topic. In 2013 organisations such as the Commission for Gender Equality have again publicly committed themselves toward lobbying for the decriminalisation of sex work. The renewed debate has necessitated a reconsideration of the Court’s decision in S v Jordan and this article focuses on the organisations that participated as amicus curiae in the matter. The discussion highlights the importance of organisational participation in litigation and how this participation could provide the context in which to consider future debates on the topic.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

Spies, Amanda. 2015. “Better Late Than Never: Lessons from S V Jordan in Strengthening Women’s Participation in Litigation”. Southern African Public Law 30 (2):505-18. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3591.

Issue

Section

Article