LAND REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA: OBSTINATE SPACIAL DISTORTIONS

  • Manala Shadrack Maake University of Limpopo
Keywords: Land Reform, Land Tenure, Apartheid Legacy, Spatial Distortions

Abstract

This theoretical paper seeks to make a significant contribution to the South African land reform discourses. The paper argues that the pace of land redistribution in South Africa is static, and therefore limits the livelihood choices of most intended beneficiaries of the land reform programme. The primacy of the programme within rural development ought to be measured and assessed through ways in which the land reform programmes conform to and improve the livelihoods, ambitions and goals of its intended beneficiaries without compromising agricultural production and the economy. Additionally, this paper highlights the slow pace of the land reform programme and its implications for the socio-economic transformation of South Africa. The paper concludes by demonstrating the need for a radical approach towards land reform which will not disrupt agricultural production, and further secure support and coordination of spheres of government. The democratic government in South Africa inherited a country which is characterised by extreme racial imbalances associated with social relations to land and overt spatial distortions. Non-white South Africans are spatially plagued with feeling the effects of colonial and apartheid legal enactments which sought to segregate ownership of resources on the basis of race. Consequently, the democratic government is mandated to formulate land reform measures to aid the reversal of colonially fuelled spatial distortions. Thus, coordination between the spheres of government, markets forces and civil society is indispensable in the accomplishment of satisfactory land reform.

References

Aliber, M and Cousins, B (2013). Livelihoods after Land Reform in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 13(1): 140–165.

Anseeuw W. (2000). Between neo-liberalism and post-imperialist land and agrarian reforms: The South African case. International Journal of Development Issues 4(2):71-93.

Binswanger, H. and Deininger, K. (1993). South African land policy: The legacy of history and current options. World Development 21: 1451–75.

Brooks, S and Kjelstrup, L (2014). An anatomy of dispassion: Post-apartheid land rights and farm dweller relocation in the context of a private game reserve initiative, northern KwaZulu-Natal. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 32 (2): 238-257.

Cochrane, P. (2006). Exploring cultural capital and its importance in sustainable development. Ecological Economics 57 (1): 318–30.

Department of Land Affairs (DLA), (1997). White Paper on Land Reform. Department of Land Affairs, Pretoria. http://land.pwv.gov.za/legislation_policies/white_papers.htm (Accessed 20 April 2016).

Gumede, V. (2014). Land reform in post-apartheid South Africa: Should South Africa follow Zimbabwe’s footsteps? International Journal of African Renaissance Studies 9 (1): 50-68.

Hart, Tim G.B (2012). How rural land reform policy translates into benefits. Development Southern Africa. 29(4).

Ikubolajeh Logan, B. (2012). Towards a reorientation in land reform: From a market to locality-driven approach in South Africa’s land restitution programme. 12(2&3): 173–191.

Jacobs, P. and Makaudze, E. (2012). Understanding rural livelihoods in the West Coastal District, South Africa. Development Southern Africa. 29(4): 574-587.

Lahiff, E. (2014). Land reform in South Africa 100 years after the Native’s Land Act. Journal of Agrarian Change 14 (4) 586–592.

Marthin, S.M. (2016). Livelihood diversification in rural Laos. World Development, 83 (1): 231-243.

McCusker, B. and Carr, E.R (2006). The co-production of livelihoods and land use change: Case studies from South Africa and Ghana. Geoforum, 37:790-804.

Ntshona, Z., Kraai, M., Kepe, T. and Saliwa, P. (2010). From land rights to environmental entitlements: Community discontent in the ‘successful’ Dwesa Cwebe land claim in South Africa? Development Southern Africa, 27:353-361.

Kepe, T. and Tessaro, D. (2014). Trading-off: Rural food security and land rights in South Africa. Department of Geography in the University of Toronto, 36:267-274.

Riggs, J. (2006). Land, farming, livelihoods and poverty: Rethinking the links is the rural South Africa. World Development, 54(1): 180-202.

Rogan, M. (2013). Alternative definitions of headship and the ‘feminisation of income-poverty in post-apartheid South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 49 (10): 1344-1357.

Sibanda, F. (2014). Beyond the Third Chimurenga. Theological Reflections on the Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe, 2000-2010, 6(8): 55.

Senadza, B. (2014) Income diversification strategies among rural household in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 5(1): 75-92

Stats SA (Statistics South Africa), 2009. Census of Commercial Agriculture 2007. Pretoria: Stats SA.

Tim GB Hart, (2012). How rural land reform policy translates into benefits. Development Southern Africa, 29(4): 563-564.

Umhlaba Wethu, 2011. A Bulletin Tracking Land Reform in South Africa. PLAAS, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town. 13.

Published
2016-12-09
How to Cite
Maake, M. S. (2016). LAND REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA: OBSTINATE SPACIAL DISTORTIONS. Africanus: Journal of Development Studies, 46(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.25159/0304-615X/1234
Section
Articles